Re: Fwd: Shared memory functions in 2 different sections?

Hello, there are 2 different sesions because of this: - The functions in shmop.xml are more low level shared memory functions than the ones in sem.xml. - The functions in shmop.xml are only available when compiling --with-shmop - The functions in sem.xml are available when cmopiling --with-sysvshm - The shmop.xml was written by the authors of the shmop extensions, so it made sense to me not to add them to sem.xml Kind regards, Derick On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Jesus Castagnetto wrote: > I am resending this msg, because I sent if when the list was not > working. Is about shm_* functions that are in 2 different sections. > (CC'ing derick@php.net who added the shmop.xml file to CVS). > > ----- Forwarded message from Jesus Castagnetto > <jmcastagnetto@zkey.com> ----- > Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 11:47:03 -0700 > From: Jesus Castagnetto <jmcastagnetto@zkey.com> > Reply-To: Jesus Castagnetto <jmcastagnetto@zkey.com> > Subject: Shared memory functions in 2 different sections? > To: PHPDOC <phpdoc@lists.php.net> > > > Before I mess up things. Is there any reason why we have some shm_* > functions in sem.xml and others in shmop.xml? Shouldn't all of them be > in only one place? As it is now it is confusing. > I noticed this when I was about to translate shmop.xml to Spanish. > > Cheers > > --- Jesus M. Castagnetto > > ------------------------------------------------- > Created by Zkey.com - http://www.zkey.com > Awarded PCMagazine's Editors' Choice >