Re: cvs: phpdoc /en bookinfo.xml preface.xml /en/features connection-handling.xml cookies.xml error-handling.xml file-upload.xml http-auth.xml
images.xml persistent-connections.xml remote-files.xml safe-mode.xml

> On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > True, it _is_ xml, but xml is very general, and that syntax doesn't > > recognise the tags. sgml is a specify form of XML, the one used here... I > > don't recall what it stands for, but it's in onde of the README's. > > You got it reversed, XML is a specific form of SGML. Shame on me! > > Try it out with vim, if you say syntax=sgml, tags like 'para', 'simpara', > > etc are colored yellow, but if they are not recognised, red. > > They are all colored fine for me.. I use vim60 though. With xml, they are all colored blue... with me, that is, and that's not vim60 apparantly. I don't know which version sysop installed... I'll ask them to upgrade. > The point is that we _are_ using XML Docbook files, not SGML, so the > syntax should be set appropriately. I notice that the emacs comment is also mode-sgml, and not xml. So, you are right, it should be xml from a meaning viewpoint. But the point of that line is ease-for-the-user. For vim < 6, syntax=sgml works, and syntax=xml doesn't. I noticed in the source of PHP a differentiation between vim6+ and vim<6, is that appropriate here? By the way, one question: How is the sgml rendering with vim600? Also okay, or really bad? Is xml better than sgml there? Jeroen