Re: vim infoline

> On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > With xml, they are all colored blue... with me, that is, and that's not > > vim60 apparantly. I don't know which version sysop installed... I'll ask > > them to upgrade. > > Type :version. 5.6.70 on the main server (where I work), 5.7 on other computers. > > I notice that the emacs comment is also mode-sgml, and not xml. > > > > > > So, you are right, it should be xml from a meaning viewpoint. But the point > > of that line is ease-for-the-user. For vim < 6, syntax=sgml works, and > > syntax=xml doesn't. > > > > I noticed in the source of PHP a differentiation between vim6+ and vim<6, is > > that appropriate here? > > Sure. Can you mail me the appropriate vim-line for version 6 then, in which at least tag coloring works fine? And indent would be nice too :-) For vim5, I think syntax=sgml is the best choice, or do you disagree? > > By the way, one question: How is the sgml rendering with vim600? Also okay, > > or really bad? Is xml better than sgml there? > > I haven't tried sgml too much. XML works great for me, especially with > indenting. I'll definitely need to upgrade :-) Thanks for the info, Jeroen