Re: Examples

> > I do not want to modify docbook. What I was talking about is the usage > > of the XML NameSpaces standard to use two DTDs side by side. This way > > In that case you lost validation and comfort of editing in PSGML. You > cann't valide your document against multiple DTDs. One of the biggest drawback of DTDs is that you cant combine them this way, you can't say in one DTD, that you plug in the other here... > Only DTD aware solution is to merge these two DTD into one. Until > support for XML schemas will widely adopted you will not have fun > with namespaces and validation. XML Spy is out for Windows, and it seems it has quite cool support for Schemas, but as it is not a widely supported standard, I have not played with it much, as it may not be useful time. I don't know of any free editors anyway with support of Schemas :(((( > Until we mist stay with DTD, using role attribute or adding new element > into DocBook is smoothest solution. Using a role seems the most appropriate. > If you want add new element for seealso on the same level as warning, > caution etc., I can write DTD customization for it. No. No. I do not want to modify the DocBook DTD. We need to be absolutely compatible with docbook, as we have many tools and style sheets for this format. Breaking compatibility would be a really bad thing(TM). Namespaces are teoretically a good solution. The only good thing four our problem is the "seealso" role you suggested. I'll see how this can help. Goba