Re: Re: doc standards (was: ugly cvs subject :)
| From: | Egon Schmid | Date: | Fri, 14 Dec 2001 17:33:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: doc standards (was: ugly cvs subject :) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969340086@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
From: "Gabor Hojtsy" <goba@mail.digitel2002.hu>
> > I should know the history. The PEAR standard was written some
years
> > after the PHP manual. So I don´t see any improvement if writers
> > should write
> >
> > function_name(args)
> > {
> > // do something
> > }
> >
> > instead of
> >
> > function_name (args) {
> > // do something
> > }
>
> Now writers use both. Isn't it better to use only one,
> and not both side by side? I think it is better to use
> one standard. Now there are examples and sample codes
> using function_name() and some function_name ()...
I doesn´ t mean only the space, look at the braces.
> The question is not only how to write functions, but how
> to write code, including functions, comments, variable
> names, constants, sample output, expressions, etc.
We cannot switch between PEAR, PECL, or another standard. Please
remove the link to PEAR.
-Egon