Re: Re: doc standards (was: ugly cvs subject :)
| From: | Gabor Hojtsy | Date: | Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:36:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: doc standards (was: ugly cvs subject :) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969339727@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> I should know the history. The PEAR standard was written some years
> after the PHP manual. So I don´t see any improvement if writers
> should write
>
> function_name(args)
> {
> // do something
> }
>
> instead of
>
> function_name (args) {
> // do something
> }
Now writers use both. Isn't it better to use only one,
and not both side by side? I think it is better to use
one standard. Now there are examples and sample codes
using function_name() and some function_name ()...
The question is not only how to write functions, but how
to write code, including functions, comments, variable
names, constants, sample output, expressions, etc.
Goba