Re: revcheck.html

> No. The it group uses the - as you say way cooler - revision > tracking method, the translation.xml, instead of the Translators I know that now. translatioln.xml was checked in yesterday. I did build it locally and it really rocks! Great work Gabor! > file. As this file is XML, the revcheck program is able to read > and generate nice tables from it, like who is doing what, and > they are in what stage, and can interlink files and people > together, etc... The translation.xml feature is not currently > documented in the howto, but you can see examples in the hu > and it tree. Hu exclusively use the translation.xml method, > dropping out the Tranlators file, as it is more convinient for > us to use this. The decision is up to the translators group > to choose... +1 for translation.xml > The revcheck script is bacward compatible to handle languages > with revision comments in files, but no translation.xml file... Ive just found some "errors" in revcheck.php, which I will fix in the next hours. What I found were only some missing "" and a need of &nbsp; in empty <td>s for Netscape. Only HTML cosmetics, but I think it is okay, if I commit them, isnt it? > Yes. And you need your languages files check out too ;) Hehe, since Ive nearly the whole cvs.php.net on my disk, this is no problem ;) Mark -- German Gabber Network @ http://www.gabber.de Infos und Tips zu PHP http://www.php-homepage.de