Re: Bug #16476 Updated: unpacking

From: Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 21:36:07 +0000
Subject: Re: Bug #16476 Updated: unpacking
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.doc 
Request: Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969344236@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi all, the arguments for both gz and bzip2 make sense to me (user-friendliness and dl-size). We Austrians tend alsways to a compromise ;) If it stays at bzip2: Why not write a link at the doc-download-page to the somewhere mentioned FAQ-Page, and list there some Freeware for Win like UltimateZip (http://www.ultimatezip.com/), so that they don't have to fight with commandline-tools which "give no feedback"? just my 2 cents :) Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > > Let's agree to disagree :) > > I still think .zip or .tar.gz is the right way to go for Windows users. > > I can understand why it's important, but I don't like > the idea. BTW it seems most of the guys think that .tar.gz > should be back... > > Goba

« previous php.doc (#969344236) next »