Re: Bug #16476 Updated: unpacking
| From: | Thomas Schöfbeck | Date: | Tue, 09 Apr 2002 21:36:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Bug #16476 Updated: unpacking | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969344236@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi all,
the arguments for both gz and bzip2 make sense to me (user-friendliness and
dl-size).
We Austrians tend alsways to a compromise ;)
If it stays at bzip2: Why not write a link at the doc-download-page to the
somewhere mentioned FAQ-Page, and list there some Freeware for Win like
UltimateZip (http://www.ultimatezip.com/), so that they don't have to fight
with commandline-tools which "give no feedback"?
just my 2 cents :)
Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> > Let's agree to disagree :)
> > I still think .zip or .tar.gz is the right way to go for Windows users.
>
> I can understand why it's important, but I don't like
> the idea. BTW it seems most of the guys think that .tar.gz
> should be back...
>
> Goba