RE: [PHP-DOC] dom docs first attempt

Can we come up with a more precise naming scheme for ID attributes then? Something like function.ext-name.func-name; we can still retain (and prefer) the current scheme, but use this one when we have a collision. This should be reasonably simple to hack into livedocs. --Wez. > -----Original Message----- > From: Nuno Lopes [mailto:nlopess@php.net] > Sent: 08 May 2004 11:58 > To: Derick Rethans > Cc: Rob Richards; phpdoc@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] dom docs first attempt > > > On Sat, 8 May 2004, Nuno Lopes wrote: > > > > > > The reason why I went with link is due to having to > append the "dom-" > to > > > the > > > > ids. I had origionally used <function></function>, but > the it wouldnt > map > > > to > > > > the ids. And I was a bit worried about the livedocs, > but there is no > other > > > > way due to the domxml functions. So how should the > links actually be > done? > > > > > > > > > You should use <function></function> as I've fixed the > links for OO > funcs. > > > (however its not fixed for DOM, because you used the > "dom-" prefix, but > as > > > I've said before, I have a patch to fix definetly these issues). > > > > He has to prefix them, otherwise we are overwriting other files. And > > then the only way is using <link> and not <function> > > > > Derick > > Thats true! I've forgotten that... He has to use <link> > otherwise the query > can return two results for the same function. > This has to be changed in domxml extension also. > > > Nuno >