Re: Re: some remaining new doc style issues

From: Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 18:46:17 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: some remaining new doc style issues
References: 1  Groups: php.doc 
Request: Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969363653@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Do you feel this should holdup the new doc style? As far as I see there are three remaining items: (a) See Also format Everyone agrees that clean markup is better than manually entering commas and and's (or entities) but how or when will this be implemented? It would be nice to have this done before moving to the new style, I can't tell if this is what you mean. Ref: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=phpdoc&m=109319660307520
I must admit I have not checked the simplelist output with the current stylesheets (DSSSL and XSLT), and I have not heard anybody doing so. First it needs to be tested, and then the relevant code needs to go in. If someone provides me with proper testfiles, I am willing to look into the issue in DSSSL and XSLT. Maybe I can even solve that :)
(b) Parameter listing information The parameter listing lives within a variable list, and information such as reference, type, and optional all live within the methodsynopsis. The idea is to have the parser extract the information from methodsynopsis and insert said information into the variable listing. The structure (afaict) is already in place so this may not be a holdup. I don't think we need to worry about dsssl/xslt for this, only livedocs, and worry about that later. Just so we agree that the current new doc format will do. Ref: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=phpdoc&m=109278378703942
1. It needs to be docbook conformant. 2. It needs to be good to be used as a reference for the parameter listing. I have not seen a proposal which fits with both criteria, or I have seriosly overlooked something.
(c) Constants on own page Not a big deal, everyone agreed on this.
Yep. Goba

« previous php.doc (#969363653) next »