Re: Documenting a pecl extension, but...

Friedhelm Betz wrote: > Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > >> Ok, since there is no actual http extension in PHP, and we use the "http >> extension" designation just to group some http related functions, what >> if we move these to the network functions (and pray that a network >> extension will not come around :), and let the http extension be >> documented under its real name: http? Plus we would link to the network >> functions documentation page on the new http extension page, so that >> people will still find built in http functionality. > > That would be the nicest solution ;-) > In addition we need to adjust the shortcuts for the integrated http > related functions, so e.g. php.net/headers points to the right place. It does not need to be adjusted. http://php.net/header (I assume you intended to mention this) goes to the header function page regardless of its parent category/extension. The individual functions (on the output) will keep their file names, shortcuts working, user notes attached, etc. The source XML files will be moved, for sure. Goba