Re: Documenting a pecl extension, but...

Michael Wallner wrote: > Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > >>> The extension name is actually http, the package has just been >>> named pecl_http because there already was a HTTP package in PEAR. >> >> Ok, since there is no actual http extension in PHP, and we use the "http >> extension" designation just to group some http related functions, what >> if we move these to the network functions (and pray that a network >> extension will not come around :), and let the http extension be >> documented under its real name: http? Plus we would link to the network >> functions documentation page on the new http extension page, so that >> people will still find built in http functionality. > > This sounds great! > I've no idea yet though, when I'll have the time to start documenting > that beast. Ok, so lets delay this issue until that time. Currently there is no pressing need to move the http functions. Goba