Re: Current annoyances with PhD
| From: | Hannes Magnusson | Date: | Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:25:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Current annoyances with PhD | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969378443@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Dec 3, 2007 9:42 PM, Edward Z. Yang <edwardzyang@thewritingpot.com> wrote:
> Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> > Better indexing+rendering, but linkends are OK as a "workaround"
> > (don't harm anyway)
>
> The only trouble is that linkend doesn't cause a link to be rendered. :-)
Don't be such a nitpicking prick! :P
I actually knew it didn't :)
PhD only supports _exactly_ (no more, no less) what phpdoc uses (in
terms of tags, attributes and general Docbook usage).
Now we can start adding better Docbook support and nifty features :) -
Lot of work ahead of us here!
> > Define "prettier"?
>
> Currently, all methodnames are defined ClassName::methodName. However,
> if a method is non-static, it really should be displayed as
> ClassName->methodName().
Why? Strictly speaking it is more correct, sure, but I then I bet we
will get bunch of "I can call this method statically - even though the
docs say ->" "bug reports".
I'd prefer consistency (all methods defined alike) - and then use the
<modifier>static</modifier> for static methods...
-Hannes