Re: Question on property definitions
| From: | Hannes Magnusson | Date: | Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:30:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Question on property definitions | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969378444@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Dec 3, 2007 9:35 PM, Edward Z. Yang <edwardzyang@thewritingpot.com> wrote:
> Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> > IMO it shouldn't, not. They should look at the "class view" if they
> > want further details on how its defined, the 'detailed property'
> > listing should only contain the description of it.
>
> Ok, that sounds fine. It might, then, be useful to have a link back from
> the detailed property to the class view. It just seems a little
> counterintuitive to me that the in-depth description is not complete,
> i.e. not everything is centralized.
The "detailed property" is a badly misused classification of the section.
It should be "Property Descriptions" (in the spirit of the <para> in
<refsect1 role="description"> for functions) :)
-Hannes