Re: Re: [PATCH] Solving the exception problem (<reference>s without <refentry>s)
| From: | Richard Quadling | Date: | Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:31:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PATCH] Solving the exception problem (<reference>s without <refentry>s) | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969379160@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
2008/7/23 Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com>
> Last chance for objections... committing in 10.. 9.. :)
>
> -Hannes
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 21:45, Hannes Magnusson
> <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Attached is a patch to the Docbook DTD which introduces a
> > phpdoc:exception element inside <book /> elements.
> >
> > <phpdoc:exception /> is defined exactly like <reference /> except that
> > <refentry /> is optional for <phpdoc:exception />.
> >
> > This solves some of the problems we have, namely the problem of
> > classes, exceptions and extensions that do not define any
> > methods/functions.
> >
> > Included in the patch is a fix for HaruException and PDOException.
> > Furthermore a patch for PhD(0_2) is attached to support the new
> > element.
> >
> > If there are no objections I'd like to commit this sometime in the
> > next couple of days...
> >
> > -Hannes
> >
>
Initially, we did say that our docs would be DB5. And I remember you saying
in IRC that DocBook5 + some extensions !== DocBook5.
But, if it solves a problem for us and it is sufficiently easy to maintain
when DB5 upgrades, then fine.
How about putting it to DB.org themselves? Like I did for the grouped
parameter mechanism? That got accepted and will allow us to describe our
optional parameters correctly (though PhD will need amending to cope with
it).
Richard.
--
-----
Richard Quadling
Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731
"Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"