Re: Re: [PATCH] Solving the exception problem (<reference>s without <refentry>s)
| From: | Hannes Magnusson | Date: | Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:07:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PATCH] Solving the exception problem (<reference>s without <refentry>s) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969379161@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:31, Richard Quadling
<rquadling@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> 2008/7/23 Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com>
>>
>> Last chance for objections... committing in 10.. 9.. :)
>>
>> -Hannes
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 21:45, Hannes Magnusson
>> <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi all
>> >
>> > Attached is a patch to the Docbook DTD which introduces a
>> > phpdoc:exception element inside <book /> elements.
>> >
>> > <phpdoc:exception /> is defined exactly like <reference /> except that
>> > <refentry /> is optional for <phpdoc:exception />.
>> >
>> > This solves some of the problems we have, namely the problem of
>> > classes, exceptions and extensions that do not define any
>> > methods/functions.
>> >
>> > Included in the patch is a fix for HaruException and PDOException.
>> > Furthermore a patch for PhD(0_2) is attached to support the new
>> > element.
>> >
>> > If there are no objections I'd like to commit this sometime in the
>> > next couple of days...
>> >
>> > -Hannes
>> >
>
> Initially, we did say that our docs would be DB5. And I remember you saying
> in IRC that DocBook5 + some extensions !== DocBook5.
Indeed. But we simply do not have another way to solve this problem
and rather then waiting another year I decided to fixed it.
Besides, we've been talking about this for a long long time. This
commit will probably set precedence for future enhancements like this,
which we should had done long time ago.
> How about putting it to DB.org themselves? Like I did for the grouped
> parameter mechanism? That got accepted and will allow us to describe our
> optional parameters correctly (though PhD will need amending to cope with
> it).
Exception/Class/Extension/.. references do not exist in the Docbook
grammar. Adding only a single element is not enough for docbook. It
would require lot more thought and time and discussion to design a
proper programming language documentation grammar.
-Hannes