Re: translators.xml standardization

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Maciej Sobaczewski <sobak@php.net> wrote: >> This file doesn't seem to be have been used for a long long time. >> In fact, I didn't even know about it when I was shuffling things >> around (DSSL->XSLT) in January 2007.. Effectively breaking the >> referenced translation.dtd - I've never heard complaints about that. > > So, should we request translations mantainers to update their files? > doc.php.net was rewritten so it would be nice to make its tools realy useful > by providing them necessary data. Its easier to do it all in one go. I imagined you already have these files checkedout already? If not, I can do it. >> The DTD says "vcs" is correct, but that was changed February 2011 from >> "vcs", probably without updating all the translations. > > Should we update DTD then? It is vcs now, so I guess thats correct - But the path to it is not. We could fix that in the way yes. >> There are three scripts that reference this file: >> ./scripts/check-trans-maint.php >> ./scripts/cvs2svn_revchange.php >> ./scripts/revcheck.php >> >> Only revcheck.php actually uses it, and it references the "vcs" >> attribute to determine how to color the contributor (e.g. old or new >> contributor?) > > Could you post link to the script you are talking about? If revcheck.php > uses "vcs" I will update rev.php from web-doc to use the same variable and > update all flies. http://svn.php.net/viewvc/phpdoc/doc-base/trunk/scripts/ -Hannes