Re: The commit

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Peter Cowburn <petercowburn@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Simion et al, > > I don't have anything much to add to this thread, other than what has > already been expressed. The only thing I would say is, if anyone reading > this is ever thinking about touching a lot of files like this, or some > other batch change, then: > > **Please discuss on the list first.** > > Wide-reaching changes have wide-reaching effects, for the most part, and > are not something to be done on a whim. > > Cheers, > Peter > > I have corrected and committed all the affected files in the translations. The steps I took: 1. I determined the list of the files affected by the initial commit. 2. For each file I found what was the previous revision number (before my commit). 3. I checked all the translations for the presence of the affected files. 4. If the file was found and it's "EN-Revision" was equal to the English file revision before my commit, I updated the EN-Revision to the number after my commit (334762). 5. I committed all changed files. The results are as follows: My initial commit affected 831 files. Affected files in translations: - 1 files in 'da' - 14 files in 'de' - 613 files in 'es' - 30 files in 'fa' - 642 files in 'fr' - 7 files in 'it' - 627 files in 'ja' - 1 files in 'kr' - 36 files in 'pl' - 6 files in 'pt_BR' - 224 files in 'ru' - 1 files in 'sr' - 13 files in 'tr' - 1 files in 'tw' - 35 files in 'zh' The good thing is that the problem was not so dramatic as Maciej predicted. And hopefully I corrected all the harm that has been done. Nevertheless I now realize that I shouldn't have done such a massive change. I apoligize again. And please let me know if I missed something and there is something more to be corrected. Sincerely, Simion.