Re: FreeBSD newbie (not PHP newbie)

From: Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 14:46:16 +0000
Subject: Re: FreeBSD newbie (not PHP newbie)
References: 1  Groups: php.general php.install 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-111379@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Schroebel" <MSchroebel@hsus.org> To: <php-general@lists.php.net>; <php-install@lists.php.net> Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 1:53 PM Subject: RE: [PHP] FreeBSD newbie (not PHP newbie) > > From: Andy Triggs [mailto:andyt@tribalddb.co.uk] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 6:21 AM > > To: php-general@lists.php.net; php-install@lists.php.net > > Subject: [PHP] FreeBSD newbie (not PHP newbie) > > > > The ports collection is new to me, as is cvsupit, but from > > what I can gather > > things aren't going to be pretty if I simply try to compile > > the PHP from the > > source as I would on, say, RedHat, and plug it in to Apache with APXS. > > I'm running Apache 1.3.26, with php on Freebsd and always compile from source, not ports. There's so many options building php, and the ports for php are vanilla. If you consider an full (textbased) GUI with which to choose the compile options vanilla, then yes it is. The ports collection is also used to build the various dependancies for the chosen compile options - so if an option, such as IMAP, isn't installed then the latest version is built along with PHP - making much more convient than building from tarballs and it just blows away the RPM system. Here's my 'vanilla' build - http://phpinfo.kyboshed.com/ HTH Danny. > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >

« previous php.general (#111379) next »