Re: PHP 5 and Shared objects
| From: | Salah Faya | Date: | Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:10:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP 5 and Shared objects | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-144714@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
What I meant is with PHP5 objects aren't treated as associated-variables so
we don't have to serialize them, do we? so when I share an object over some
session the object itself will actually stay alive and only the resource-id
will be passed from file to file trhough same session, in other words the
object is not being recreated while keeping its resource-id in a registered
session variable, or I'm wrong?
About the global object, it could be a security risk if the programmer is
gonna use it badly (u r right)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Beaver" <greg@chiaraquartet.net>
To: "Salah Faya" <salah@e-touch.ws>
Cc: <php-general@lists.php.net>
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: PHP 5 and Shared objects
> This is already possible in php 4. However, both file1.php and
> file2.php must begin with a session_start() call.
>
> A global object (common to all sessions) is a big security risk, I would
> be surprised if it is considered a feature by the php team. You can
> simulate such a thing yourself, by using a database, or a file on the
> server backend that contains the serialized contents of the object, and
> retrieve them in the beginning of each file.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
> --
> phpDocumentor
> http://www.phpdoc.org
>
> Salah Faya wrote:
> > As I've understood that PHP5 OOP will allow us to use a session-level
shared
> > objects smoothly, as in example:
> >
> > - file1.php
> > session_register('myObj');
> > $myObj = new myClass(2003);
> > $x = $myObj->year; // returns 2003
> > header('location: file2.php?PHPSESID='.session_id());
> >
> > - file2.php
> > if (isset($_SESSION['myObj'])) {
> > $myObj=$_SESSION['myObj'];
> > echo $myObj->year; // should also return 2003
> > }
> >
> > am I right? please correct me
> >
> > And if that's correct, is there a way to make a global object over all
> > sessions (immortal object)? can this be a good feature to request?
> >
> >
>
>
>