Re: Re: OOP vs procedural

From: Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 19:54:35 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: OOP vs procedural
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-146558@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Thanks for the reply! One more question and I will get back to coding :) Is what is XSLT processed by on the server side? /T on 5/6/03 13:05, Davy Obdam at info@davyobdam.com wrote: > Hi, > > There a few possibilty`s here i think: > > 1. Using CSS to display XML client side, however i think this is usualy > a bad idea, mainly because not all browsers suppoit it > 2. Using XSLT to transform your XML on the client(to XHTML), well same > as the above, not all browser are yet capable of doing this, and you > probably have more data in your XML file that you would like your client > to see... maybe. > 3. The best option is to use XSLT to transform your XML and doing it on > the server. This adds flexiblity because now you can create multiple XSL > stylesheets to transform your XML in the required output format, XML, > XHTML, cHTML or whatever you may need. > In case of a webbrowser on a PC/Mac your send the client gets valid > XHTML, wich is HTML wich confirms to the XML standards;-) > > Just my 0,2 cents > > Info@Best-IT wrote: > >> I've heard a lot that XML is taking over. Is the browser going to read some >> kind of HTML or straight HTML. Take FlashMX for instance, you can build a >> movie which is essentially an application driven by XML. But the XML is >> like a Database with nodes instead of records. This can be dynamically >> generated and read by the Flash movie, but because it's flash. If you took >> that same flow and created an app that had a browser for the front end >> instead of flash player, how would you get the browser to understand what it >> needed to display? Are browsers going to be re-written? - Most likely my >> thought process is off track. Mainly I don't understand how a browser can >> read XML? >> >> R/T >> > > Best regards, > > Davy Obdam

« previous php.general (#146558) next »