Re: Re: OOP vs procedural
| From: | Justin French | Date: | Tue, 06 May 2003 23:38:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: OOP vs procedural | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-146603@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Any links to really good articles on this stuff?
Justin
on 07/05/03 5:05 AM, Davy Obdam (info@davyobdam.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There a few possibilty`s here i think:
>
> 1. Using CSS to display XML client side, however i think this is usualy
> a bad idea, mainly because not all browsers suppoit it
> 2. Using XSLT to transform your XML on the client(to XHTML), well same
> as the above, not all browser are yet capable of doing this, and you
> probably have more data in your XML file that you would like your client
> to see... maybe.
> 3. The best option is to use XSLT to transform your XML and doing it on
> the server. This adds flexiblity because now you can create multiple XSL
> stylesheets to transform your XML in the required output format, XML,
> XHTML, cHTML or whatever you may need.
> In case of a webbrowser on a PC/Mac your send the client gets valid
> XHTML, wich is HTML wich confirms to the XML standards;-)
>
> Just my 0,2 cents
>
> Info@Best-IT wrote:
>
>> I've heard a lot that XML is taking over. Is the browser going to read some
>> kind of HTML or straight HTML. Take FlashMX for instance, you can build a
>> movie which is essentially an application driven by XML. But the XML is
>> like a Database with nodes instead of records. This can be dynamically
>> generated and read by the Flash movie, but because it's flash. If you took
>> that same flow and created an app that had a browser for the front end
>> instead of flash player, how would you get the browser to understand what it
>> needed to display? Are browsers going to be re-written? - Most likely my
>> thought process is off track. Mainly I don't understand how a browser can
>> read XML?
>>
>> R/T
>>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Davy Obdam