Re: Re: Red Hat 9, Apache 2, and PHP
| From: | Mark Charette | Date: | Fri, 04 Jul 2003 01:01:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Red Hat 9, Apache 2, and PHP | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-153945@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Apache 2.x.x IS a production quality server, just not with PHP. Works great
with Tomcat, mod_jk2, Struts, etc.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shena Delian O'Brien" <shena@darklock.com>
To: <php-general@lists.php.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Red Hat 9, Apache 2, and PHP
> Does anyone know why Red Hat would switch to Apache 2.x.x when it is
> well known that 2.x.x is NOT a production version?
>
> Brad Pauly wrote:
> > Just thought I would share my experience with RH9. I have been running
> > Apache 1.3.27 and PHP 4.3.2 on RH9 for a couple weeks (since 4.3.2 came
> > out anyway, and 4.3.1 prior to that) on a test server. All are compiled
> > from source. The only problem I have had was a bug with the version of
> > mogrify that is bundled with RH9. That was fixed by 'upgrading' to an
> > older version. Other than that it has been fine.
> >
> > Brad
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>