RE: [PHP] Re: Red Hat 9, Apache 2, and PHP

Does anyone have any idea or could give me an idea why php & apache 2.0 is not 'good' together? Cheers, Mun Heng, Ow H/M Engineering Western Digital M'sia DID : 03-7870 5168 -----Original Message----- From: Mark Charette [mailto:charette@woodwind.org] Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 9:02 AM To: php-general@lists.php.net; Shena Delian O'Brien Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Red Hat 9, Apache 2, and PHP Apache 2.x.x IS a production quality server, just not with PHP. Works great with Tomcat, mod_jk2, Struts, etc. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shena Delian O'Brien" <shena@darklock.com> To: <php-general@lists.php.net> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 8:04 PM Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Red Hat 9, Apache 2, and PHP > Does anyone know why Red Hat would switch to Apache 2.x.x when it is > well known that 2.x.x is NOT a production version? > > Brad Pauly wrote: > > Just thought I would share my experience with RH9. I have been running > > Apache 1.3.27 and PHP 4.3.2 on RH9 for a couple weeks (since 4.3.2 came > > out anyway, and 4.3.1 prior to that) on a test server. All are compiled > > from source. The only problem I have had was a bug with the version of > > mogrify that is bundled with RH9. That was fixed by 'upgrading' to an > > older version. Other than that it has been fine. > > > > Brad > > > > > > > > > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >