Re: pop3 functions
| From: | andu | Date: | Mon, 18 Aug 2003 21:52:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: pop3 functions | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-159956@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:40:31 -0500
Ken <kenzo@free-music.com> wrote:
> Those weird function names are taken straight from C. Blame the
> inventors of C. PHP is partly intended to be easy to learn for C
> programmers.
I'm wondering how many php users are C programmers...
Can only blame the php inventors for using a bad model.
>
> - Ken
>
> At 02:15 PM 8/16/2003 -0400, andu wrote:
> >I take the opportunity to express my 2 major problems I found with
> >php in the 2 months I've been using it.
> >First is the naming of functions (whoever was the illiterate one who
> >invented them) definitely not meant to be remembered or to represent
> >what they actually do. It's a shame to have to fill our minds with
> >such garbage: strcasecmp, strchr, strcmp, strcoll, strcspn, stripos,
> >stristr, strspn, strstr, to take just a few. A programming language
> >has already its problems for not being natural, no need to make it
> >even more so. Second, it the array overkill.
> >Nevertheless, I love it.
>
>
>
--
Regards, Andu Novac