Re: pop3 functions
| From: | andu | Date: | Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:02:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: pop3 functions | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-160017@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 22:10:25 +0600
"jabber@raditha.com" <jabber@raditha.com> wrote:
> Nopes i read you correctly, yours was a complaint against c.
Good thing you didn't take it as a complaint against you...
>
>
> andu wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:49:43 +0600
> >raditha dissanayake <raditha@raditha.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>andu wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:40:31 -0500
> >>>Ken <kenzo@free-music.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Those weird function names are taken straight from C. Blame the
> >>>>inventors of C. PHP is partly intended to be easy to learn for C
> >>>>programmers.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>I'm wondering how many php users are C programmers...
> >>>Can only blame the php inventors for using a bad model.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Just because you cannot understand something does not mean it's bad.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Sounds like you're talking about yourself, I never said C was
> >a 'bad' language, I was complaining about the functions names in php,
> >if you care to read more carefully. My point was that when creating a
> >language you have the freedom to shape the 'vocabulary' any way you
> >want (more or less) and it is common sense to do it so that it's
> >easily usable by a variety of users.
> >
> >
> >
> >>Your mail arrived to this mailing list through several mail nodes
> >>writted purely in C.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>- Ken
> >>>>
> >>>>At 02:15 PM 8/16/2003 -0400, andu wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>I take the opportunity to express my 2 major problems I found
> >with>>>>php in the 2 months I've been using it.
> >>>>>First is the naming of functions (whoever was the illiterate one
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>who>>invented them) definitely not meant to be remembered or to
> >>>represent>>what they actually do. It's a shame to have to fill our
> >>>minds with>>such garbage: strcasecmp, strchr, strcmp, strcoll,
> >>>strcspn, stripos,>>stristr, strspn, strstr, to take just a few. A
> >>>programming language>>has already its problems for not being
> >natural,>>no need to make it>>even more so. Second, it the array
> >overkill.>>
> >>>
> >>>>>Nevertheless, I love it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>--
> >>
> >>Raditha Dissanayake
> >>-------------------------------------------------------------
> >>http://www.radinks.com/sftp/
> >>Lean and mean Secure FTP applet with Graphical User Inteface.
> >>just 150 Kilo Bytes
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> >>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Raditha Dissanayake
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.radinks.com/sftp/
> Lean and mean Secure FTP applet with Graphical User Inteface.
> just 150 Kilo Bytes
>
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
>
--
Andu