RE: [PHP] Re: php mail() scaleability

From: Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 02:36:30 +0000
Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: php mail() scaleability
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-184596@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Unfortunately Sendmail is not as popular as it once was, as a commercial developer my clients would not be tolerante of their website mandating which mail server they must run therefore in this case I choose portability. Additionally using PEAR Mail you can actually specify if you want to use sendmail, backend to the mail() call or use SMTP with Authentication. Personally when both PEAR and non PEAR packages are available I generally adopt the PEAR package unless there are credible benefits of the non PEAR package. Jason -----Original Message----- From: Jason Barnett [mailto:jasbarne@indiana.edu] Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 6:39 PM To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: php mail() scaleability Manuel Lemos wrote: > Hello, > > On 04/25/2004 06:03 PM, Jason Sheets wrote: > >> Take a look at the Mail Queue class from PEAR, it enables you to put >> mail in the Queue instead of real time delivery. >> >> http://pear.php.net/packages.php?catpid=14&catname=Mail > > > This is a bit of an overkill as it attempts to provide an inefficient > solution replicate the dedicated solution built-in sendmail for > queueing messages that can be called with a few lines of code, thus > without needing a large PHP package. > But what about those of us without sendmail? :) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

« previous php.general (#184596) next »