Re: Super globals ?
| From: | Kevin Waterson | Date: | Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:02:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Super globals ? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-221005@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
This one time, at band camp, Jasper Bryant-Greene <jasper@bryant-greene.name> wrote:
> Because he asked for superglobals, not globals. $GLOBALS (not $_GLOBALS)
meh, force of habit
> happens to be an example of a superglobal.
and variable can be set within its scope, so why not use it?
As we see in the manual at $GLOBALS _is_ a super global and available
to all scopes within the script.
http://www.php.net/manual/en/reserved.variables.php#reserved.variables.globals
it refers to $GLOBALS as " This is a 'superglobal', or automatic global, variable.
"
gotta love the php manual
kevin
--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."