Re: Super globals ?

From: Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:50:24 +0000
Subject: Re: Super globals ?
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-221008@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
yes, I am asking how to start my own super global... And even a PHP beginner know that $GLOBALS is a array containing all the global variables and it is used in a function or a class. So I think no one will ask a question here which the answer is simply $GLOBALS. Any finally, thanks Jasper for the answer. "Jasper Bryant-Greene" <jasper@bryant-greene.name> wrote:43071D3D.5060603@bryant-greene.name... > Kevin Waterson wrote: >> This one time, at band camp, Jasper Bryant-Greene >> <jasper@bryant-greene.name> wrote: >> >> >>>Because he asked for superglobals, not globals. $GLOBALS (not $_GLOBALS) >> >> meh, force of habit >> >>>happens to be an example of a superglobal. >> >> >> and variable can be set within its scope, so why not use it? >> As we see in the manual at $GLOBALS _is_ a super global and available >> to all scopes within the script. >> >> http://www.php.net/manual/en/reserved.variables.php#reserved.variables.globals >> it refers to $GLOBALS as " This is a 'superglobal', or automatic global, >> variable. " >> >> gotta love the php manual > > Exactly Kevin. What the OP wanted was to create another superglobal, just > like $GLOBALS. The contents of $GLOBALS refer to the global variables, > which are *not* all superglobals. The only superglobals by default in PHP > (apart from $GLOBALS) are $_SERVER, $_GET, $_POST, and so on. > > He asked a question, and I provided the answer. Why he wants to do it is > another question, but telling him to "use $GLOBALS" isn't answering his > question, it's answering a different question, namely how to access the > global variables. > > Jasper

« previous php.general (#221008) next »