Re: Super globals ?
| From: | Wong HoWang | Date: | Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:50:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Super globals ? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-221008@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
yes, I am asking how to start my own super global...
And even a PHP beginner know that $GLOBALS is a array containing all the
global variables and it is used in a function or a class. So I think no one
will ask a question here which the answer is simply $GLOBALS.
Any finally, thanks Jasper for the answer.
"Jasper Bryant-Greene" <jasper@bryant-greene.name>
wrote:43071D3D.5060603@bryant-greene.name...
> Kevin Waterson wrote:
>> This one time, at band camp, Jasper Bryant-Greene
>> <jasper@bryant-greene.name> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Because he asked for superglobals, not globals. $GLOBALS (not $_GLOBALS)
>>
>> meh, force of habit
>>
>>>happens to be an example of a superglobal.
>>
>>
>> and variable can be set within its scope, so why not use it?
>> As we see in the manual at $GLOBALS _is_ a super global and available
>> to all scopes within the script.
>>
>> http://www.php.net/manual/en/reserved.variables.php#reserved.variables.globals
>> it refers to $GLOBALS as " This is a 'superglobal', or automatic global,
>> variable. "
>>
>> gotta love the php manual
>
> Exactly Kevin. What the OP wanted was to create another superglobal, just
> like $GLOBALS. The contents of $GLOBALS refer to the global variables,
> which are *not* all superglobals. The only superglobals by default in PHP
> (apart from $GLOBALS) are $_SERVER, $_GET, $_POST, and so on.
>
> He asked a question, and I provided the answer. Why he wants to do it is
> another question, but telling him to "use $GLOBALS" isn't answering his
> question, it's answering a different question, namely how to access the
> global variables.
>
> Jasper