RE: [PHP] Re: php-general Digest 19 Oct 2000 07:34:18 -0000 Issue295

> I doubt that...I got solid evidence to draw a case now. > Considering your a developer I expect what you said. I would be interested in seeing this evidence. I am not a developer, I help out with the QA and the Docs ;) Anyway I would argue that PHP 4 is as stable as PHP3 was due to the fact the code is cleaner and a lot of it was ported from PHP3 and the zend engine has been abstracted, there are some install problems that need fixing but that is being done, the majority of this is docu problems and helping people fix thier own problems rather than coming here or php-dev and calling them bugs. The bug database is the least crowded it has been for a long time and the uptake of php has grown. But if you have evidence to show that im wrong post it.. I would love to see it. > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, James Moore wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 00:11:38 -0000 > > From: James Moore <jmoore@php.net> > > To: Dan Phoenix <dphoenix@bravenet.com> > > Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: php-general Digest 19 Oct 2000 07:34:18 -0000 > > Issue 295 > > > > > > > > > > Just so everyone knows...php4 just is not stable at all. > > > php3 can handle loads way better and uses way less resources. > > > THis has been tested over and over again. We get developers > blaming it on > > > mysql libraries etc....well then tell me how it worked so > well in 3 and > > > not in 4. > > > > > > Thank-you for your time....I agree php4 is great...for small sized > > > database companies. > > > > > > > Interesting opinion I think you might be on your own there... > > > > James > > >