Re: E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR - 5.1.6 to 5.2.0

# robert@interjinn.com / 2007-01-04 05:51:12 -0500: > On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 10:15 +0000, Stut wrote: > > Gregory Beaver wrote: > > > This is a good example of how the flexibility of PHP can bite you, > > > but is also a good example of how bad coding adds both complexity and > > > inefficiency to the resulting software. If f() is called often, > > > there might be a noticeable speedup if it were replaced. I once had > > > a complex database ORM-HTML mapping app that was about 10% faster > > > when I replaced all the "" strings with '' strings. This was on > > > a > > > slow machine with an early PHP, but little things like this can be > > > very important. > > > > http://dev.stut.net/phpspeed/ > > You forgot to benchmark echo, everyone (me anyways) knows echo is faster > than print. Why you ask? Because print returns a value, echo does not :) And printf() is faster than echo: Using <?php echo $x; ?> Took 1.4402 seconds ť Reveal output Using <?php print $x; ?> Took 1.1628 seconds ť Reveal output Using <?php printf('%s', $x); ?> Took 0.8289 seconds ť Reveal output -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991