Re: E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR - 5.1.6 to 5.2.0
| From: | Jochem Maas | Date: | Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:32:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR - 5.1.6 to 5.2.0 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-246521@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Stut wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 10:15 +0000, Stut wrote:
>> > Gregory Beaver wrote:
>> >> This is a good example of how the flexibility of PHP can bite
>> >> you, but is also a good example of how bad coding adds both
>> >> complexity and inefficiency to the resulting software. If f() is
>> >> called often, there might be a noticeable speedup if it were
>> >> replaced. I once had a complex database ORM-HTML mapping app
>> >> that was about 10% faster when I replaced all the "" strings with
>> >> '' strings. This was on a slow machine with an early PHP, but
>> >> little things like this can be very important.
>> > http://dev.stut.net/phpspeed/
nice little overview.
>>
>> You forgot to benchmark echo, everyone (me anyways) knows echo is
>> faster than print. Why you ask? Because print returns a value, echo
>> does not :)
>
> You *know* that for a fact do you?
>
> I've added a plain echo to complement the plain print, and in the 5 or 6
> runs I've done print is always faster, but not by much.
out of interest, are you logging the result of each request? your probably getting
quite a lot of hits to your phpspeed page right now - storing the results of everyone's
requests is a nice way to grab extra/free data whilst you pick your nose ;-)
>
> -Stut
>