RE: [PHP] Require() vs Include()
| From: | Maxim Maletsky | Date: | Tue, 14 Nov 2000 04:33:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] Require() vs Include() | ||
| Groups: | php.general | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-25117@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Well,
with include() if an included file does not exists it WILL fail.
so where's the difference?
-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence.Sheed@dfait-maeci.gc.ca
[mailto:Lawrence.Sheed@dfait-maeci.gc.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 1:26 PM
To: Maxim Maletsky
Subject: RE: [PHP] Require() vs Include()
include won't fail out if the includes not there, but require will.
If you have something that *has* to be in there, then require is used, if
something could be optional - eg a generated header or something than might
be or might not be there at a given time, use include.
-----Original Message-----
From: Maxim Maletsky [mailto:maxim.maletsky@japaninc.net]
Sent: November 14, 2000 12:21 PM
To: 'PHP General List. (E-mail)'
Subject: [PHP] Require() vs Include()
Hi,
A tiny question:
why to use require() when include() works just as well and even better when
there are some conditions like if{} ?
I ask it because although I read many articles on this issue I found no
reason for myself to use require() instead of include() and I have driven
some huge projects in PHP.
Why do I see these hardcore PHP gurus writing PHPLIB, mySQLadmin and
examples in their articles using require() where include() would fit just as
perfect?
WHERE THE TRIIIICK?
It escapes from me ...
Thanks.
Maxim Maletsky - maxim@j-door.com <mailto:maxim@j-door.com>
Webmaster, J-Door.com / J@pan Inc.
LINC Media, Inc.
TEL: 03-3499-2175 x 1271
FAX: 03-3499-3109
http://www.j-door.com <http://www.j-door.com/>
http://www.japaninc.net <http://www.japaninc.net/>
http://www.lincmedia.co.jp <http://www.lincmedia.co.jp/>