RE: [PHP] Require() vs Include()
| From: | Lawrence dot Sheed at dfait-maeci dot gc dot ca | Date: | Tue, 14 Nov 2000 04:37:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] Require() vs Include() | ||
| Groups: | php.general | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-25118@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Ok,
Require will always add in the file even if its not executed.
Eg
if (isset($includeme)) {
require ("xxx.php");
}
require will be included in the file parsed by php
but the following will not get included in the file if $includeme is not
set.
if (isset($includeme)) {
include ("xxx.php");
}
An important note about how this works is that when a file is include()ed or
require()ed, parsing drops out of PHP mode and into HTML mode at the
beginning of the target file, and resumes PHP mode again at the end. For
this reason, any code inside the target file which should be executed as PHP
code must be enclosed within valid PHP start and end tags.
Unlike include(), require() will always read in the target file, even if the
line it's on never executes. If you want to conditionally include a file,
use include(). The conditional statement won't affect the require().
However, if the line on which the require() occurs is not executed, neither
will any of the code in the target file be executed.
The manual is actually pretty good on this topic imho.
http://www.php.net/manual/function.require.php
-----Original Message-----
From: Maxim Maletsky [mailto:maxim.maletsky@japaninc.net]
Sent: November 14, 2000 12:34 PM
To: 'Lawrence.Sheed@dfait-maeci.gc.ca'
Cc: 'PHP General List. (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: [PHP] Require() vs Include()
Well,
with include() if an included file does not exists it WILL fail.
so where's the difference?
-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence.Sheed@dfait-maeci.gc.ca
[mailto:Lawrence.Sheed@dfait-maeci.gc.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 1:26 PM
To: Maxim Maletsky
Subject: RE: [PHP] Require() vs Include()
include won't fail out if the includes not there, but require will.
If you have something that *has* to be in there, then require is used, if
something could be optional - eg a generated header or something than might
be or might not be there at a given time, use include.
-----Original Message-----
From: Maxim Maletsky [mailto:maxim.maletsky@japaninc.net]
Sent: November 14, 2000 12:21 PM
To: 'PHP General List. (E-mail)'
Subject: [PHP] Require() vs Include()
Hi,
A tiny question:
why to use require() when include() works just as well and even better when
there are some conditions like if{} ?
I ask it because although I read many articles on this issue I found no
reason for myself to use require() instead of include() and I have driven
some huge projects in PHP.
Why do I see these hardcore PHP gurus writing PHPLIB, mySQLadmin and
examples in their articles using require() where include() would fit just as
perfect?
WHERE THE TRIIIICK?
It escapes from me ...
Thanks.
Maxim Maletsky - maxim@j-door.com <mailto:maxim@j-door.com>
Webmaster, J-Door.com / J@pan Inc.
LINC Media, Inc.
TEL: 03-3499-2175 x 1271
FAX: 03-3499-3109
http://www.j-door.com <http://www.j-door.com/>
http://www.japaninc.net <http://www.japaninc.net/>
http://www.lincmedia.co.jp <http://www.lincmedia.co.jp/>