Re: WWE in Stamford, CT needs a kick ass PHP Developer!
| From: | Robert Cummings | Date: | Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:17:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: WWE in Stamford, CT needs a kick ass PHP Developer! | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-252834@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Dear Tedd,
Please put me down for one pint of asshole, because while you sit on
that glass pedestal of CSS superiority I can't help but notice how
http://ancientstones.com/ looks completely fucked up in
Opera. Opera I
might add is ACID2 compliant. Now please go shove your "better than thou
CSS up your ass" :) Trust me, I am at least as versed as you in CSS and
choose to use tables.
Cheers,
Rob.
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 20:02 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 6:31 PM -0500 4/12/07, Richard Lynch wrote:
> >On Thu, April 12, 2007 1:34 pm, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >> ... It's too bad, I love CSS, it
> >> makes for really clean markup, but using it completely in place of
> >> tables just isn't feasible right now without resorting to CSS
> >> "tricks".
> >> And using tricks is just as much against the spirit of CSS as using
> >> tables for layout :)
> >
> >While straying even more OT than usual, I must chime in with "me too"
> >
> >I cannot count the number of times I've seen CSS purists pull out
> >gnarly disgusting hacks, far worse than any nested table layout, to
> >work around browser incompatibilities.
> >
> >It would be nice if CSS actually let designers specify what they need
> >to specify. [Can you say 3-column layout with page footer?]
> >
> >And if browsers actually implemented CSS correctly...
> >
> >But, really, CSS is still lacking in what seems to me some basic
> >fundamentals in terms of being able to say "put this thing here, and
> >that thing there" and you end up resorting to all kinds of
> >non-intuitive code to get the look you want...
>
> Richard, you surprise me.
>
> CSS is like any other tool -- learn to use it and it will work.
>
> As far as any layout, if you can show an example it can be done in css.
>
> As far as replacing tables, CSS doesn't -- it provides tables even
> more versatility. Tables have their place, but not in layout.
>
> Lastly, one man's gnarly disgusting hack, is another man's way around
> a short coming of IE. How many times have you had to use javascript
> to accomplish a task instead of using just php? One could call that a
> gnarly disgusting hack, but it's just a solution. As this list
> proves, no language is without problems.
>
> Cheers,
>
> tedd
> --
> -------
> http://sperling.com
> http://ancientstones.com
> http://earthstones.com
>
--
.------------------------------------------------------------.
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com
|
:------------------------------------------------------------:
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily. |
`------------------------------------------------------------'