Re: Re: Re: php-cli vs python
| From: | Robert Cummings | Date: | Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:31:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Re: php-cli vs python | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-256322@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 16:19 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Abdullah Ramazanoglu <ar018@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> If I'm not completely mistaken, I think that Python can even
> interface with the GNOME libraries. PHP could theoretically do that,
> as well, if someone went through and created extensions for it all.
>
> PHP is an excellent command-line interpreter, in my opinion. I'd
> say that, in all of my day-to-day PHP programming, about 60% of the
> code is for the web, with 35% being run from the command line, and 5%
> magically disappearing, to loud screams of frustration and broken
> coffee mugs.
I had one of those little screams yesterday when I started using the
PHP's id3 lib when I realized it's crap because it can't delete or write
version 2 tags. Fortunately I found a nice user comment pointing me to
the PHP implemented getid3 lib. An hour later my mp3 collection (several
thousand ripped from my own CD collection of course :) had nice ID3 tags
based on the directories and filenames I had created a few years ago.
Wasn't an issue when I was using XMMS but I just switched to Amarok and
it makes extensive sensible use of ID3 tags :)
Cheers,
Rob.
--
.------------------------------------------------------------.
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com
|
:------------------------------------------------------------:
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily. |
`------------------------------------------------------------'