Re: Re: Re: php-cli vs python

Crayon Shin Chan wrote: > On Saturday 09 June 2007 01:22, Daniel Brown wrote: > >> I actually haven't found a platform yet that I couldn't port PHP >> to, if it wasn't already native. We're talking Windows, Linux, BSD, >> true *nix, MacOS, SunOS, Amiga, et cetera. I doubt it would run on my >> old Commodore 64 with the 1541 5.25" floppy drive (LOAD "*",8,1), but >> you can emulate a C64 in PHP (http://phpc64.extra.hu). ;-P > > Perhaps it would've been better to say "it is _available_ on more > platforms". No doubt given enough dedication you can probably get both > Python and PHP to _run_ on most platforms. However as an example, Python > (albeit an older version) is running happily on Nokia S60 phones, whereas > AFAIK there are no PHP running on said phones. An f'ing big rant deserves to go here about f***wits that can't communicate who spend all day staring the display of a multimedia commuication device that and the number of people without access to clean water. ... but I can't be bothered, too busy watching a South American soap on my mobile. :-/ > > Also Python supports all the major GUI bindings whereas PHP only supports > GTK (AFAIK). which reminds of the guy from LotusNotes fame - whose still try to build the perfect PIM ... using Python, all good and well but slow as congealed dogshit through a seive doesn't even begin to describe it. IT is a joke, this list is joke, I'm a joke. no joke. >