Re: manual vs. meta refresh
| From: | Geoff Nicol | Date: | Sun, 12 Aug 2007 02:36:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: manual vs. meta refresh | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-260720@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Rob,
What you suggested, which matches the theory of what I and others suggested,
would certainly work as an ID that changes is involved.
If you read the specific posting by Richard Lynch, which is what I was
replying to, you will note he suggest refreshing to a static
'was_meta_refresh_before' link which of course won't work as refreshing
manually at that point will be indistinguishable from a true meta-refresh
after the redirect has occurred.
Anyways; this thread seems done, there are several solid suggestions on how
to do it properly.
I just didn't want it to close on an incomplete solution, as people
apparently don't read the thread history ;)
-Geoff
On 8/11/07, Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 18:26 -0700, Geoff Nicol wrote:
> > And if they do a manual refresh on the page you re-directed to, the
> > "was_meta_refresh_before" flag will be set.
> > How will you tell it from a meta-refresh redirect?
>
> I already explained this in previous email. Go read the history of this
> thread.
>
> Cheers,
> Rob.
> --
> ...........................................................
> SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com
>
> Leveraging the buying power of the masses!
> ...........................................................
>