Re: manual vs. meta refresh

From: Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 02:39:43 +0000
Subject: Re: manual vs. meta refresh
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-260721@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 19:36 -0700, Geoff Nicol wrote: > Rob, > > What you suggested, which matches the theory of what I and others > suggested, would certainly work as an ID that changes is involved. > > If you read the specific posting by Richard Lynch, which is what I was > replying to, you will note he suggest refreshing to a static > 'was_meta_refresh_before' link which of course won't work as > refreshing manually at that point will be indistinguishable from a > true meta-refresh after the redirect has occurred. > > Anyways; this thread seems done, there are several solid suggestions > on how to do it properly. > > I just didn't want it to close on an incomplete solution, as people > apparently don't read the thread history ;) Ah ok, I see what you're saying. Yeah, Richard must have missed that you can't just redirect to a URL and all is well. Cheers, Rob. -- ........................................................... SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com Leveraging the buying power of the masses! ...........................................................

« previous php.general (#260721) next »