Re: How can I do this -- method chaining
| From: | Stut | Date: | Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:31:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: How can I do this -- method chaining | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-268337@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Jim Lucas wrote:
Stut wrote:"I would *just* use a static method" *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* No instance. None. Grrr. FFS. -Stut -- http://stut.net/Nathan Nobbe wrote:From your previous email <?php class Test {On Jan 30, 2008 10:53 AM, Stut <stuttle@gmail.com <mailto:stuttle@gmail.com>> wrote:I meant "I would *just* use a static method". Calling a static method does not create an instance of the class. My comments usually follow the rule of Ronseal. What do you think I meant by it? -StutNathan Nobbe wrote: I never said I wasn't creating an instance in the example I posted.then what exactly did you mean by this? Actually no, I mean I would *just* use a static method. If there is no reason to instantiate an object, why would you?public static function doSomething() { $o = new Test();The above line IS creating a instance of the class Test Now with proper garbage collection, it should be wiped out when you are done using the static doSomething() method.$o->_doSomething();You could always include this to remove the instance of class Testunset($o);}protected function _doSomething() { // I'm assuming this method is fairly complex, and involves // more than just this method, otherwise there is no point // in creating an instance of the class, just use a static // method. }} Test::doSomething(); ?>