Re: How can I do this -- method chaining

From: Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:19:38 +0000
Subject: Re: How can I do this -- method chaining
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-268347@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Jan 30, 2008 11:58 AM, Stut <stuttle@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, I'm going to have to assume you really are as stupid as you seem. If > I need to provide an example to demonstrate what I meant I will, but I > feel I made it quite clear that my comment regarding what *I* would do > did not in any way relate to the code example I had provided above. The > example I provided was fulfilling the OP's requirements. > > This is what *I* would do... > > <?php > class Test { > public static function doSomething() { > // I'm assuming this method is fairly complex, and involves > // more than just this method, otherwise there is no point > // in creating an instance of the class, just use a static > // method. > > // ^^^^ See this comment here, this was taken from the > // non-static method in the example I posted. This is what > // I meant when I say "just use a static method". > } > } > Test::doSomething(); > ?> > > Look ma, no instance. > well, at least its clear now, what you meant. > FYI I'm not at all new to OOP, in general or in PHP, so I am well aware > that the example I originally posted created an instance of the class. glad to hear it; no hard feelings i hope.. -nathan

« previous php.general (#268347) next »