Re: Semi-ADVERT, not really spam, sorry for it

On 8/19/2008 5:49 PM India Time, _metastable_ wrote:

I stand by my point though. Had it actually been an advert, which it was not, a post count of 9 would not inspire confidence in his qualities as a determined support engineer.

I think incorrigible is the word for you. V S rawat java http://groups.google.co.in/groups/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&q=V+S+rawat+java&qt_s=Search 284 hits, V S rawat javascript http://groups.google.co.in/groups/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&q=V+S+rawat+javascript&qt_s=Search 212 hits, V S rawat perl http://groups.google.co.in/groups/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&q=V+S+rawat+perl&qt_s=Search 122 hits V S rawat crack http://groups.google.co.in/groups/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&q=V+S+rawat+crack&qt_s=Search 56 hits (that crack was for serial/keygen/ cracks type of crack. Not what you just thought.) V S rawat http://groups.google.co.in/groups/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&q=V+S+rawat&qt_s=Search 13,000 hits.

regards, Stijn

I foresee you now declaring me the biggest spammer on ngs. I am on ngs since when Groups.Google was not born and Deja (what was the name?) was ruling the roost which was then bought by Google to get content for groups.google. -- V