Re: APC vs. eaccelerator?

On 8/25/08, David Park <dparkmit@gmail.com> wrote: > Some older posts on the net (from 2006) complained about incompatibilities > between APC/eacclerator and phpBB and about crashes of APC/eacclerator. I'm > hoping that these problems have been cleared up by now. 2006 is a century ago in open source time :P i was using turck mmcache which turned into eaccelerator for a while. i also tried xcache. however, i switched to APC over a year ago now. it's maintained by core php developers, so i figure it's the best as it would receive little "perks" due to new features/fixes being put in to the core php code and the developers implementing them working on APC. i have never done any benchmarks or anything, but i'm pretty sure they're all relatively close speed-wise. stability-wise i've never had an issue with APC.. the file upload stuff would be cool except i need something that supports multiple webservers, not shared memory on a specific host. besides, i think i've heard PHP6 will have a built in byte-code cache already, and i am sure it will use APC/portions of APC (why not, it's already there)