Re: APC vs. eaccelerator?
| From: | Robert Cummings | Date: | Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:02:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: APC vs. eaccelerator? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-278690@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 10:24 -0700, David Park wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I currently run a phpBB site using phpBB v. 2.0.22 and PHP4. We'd like to
> install either APC or eaccelerator to speed up the site's performance. I'm
> not sure whether we should choose APC or eaccelerator since I'm a newbie to
> PHP caching.
>
> Which do you think is better - APC or eacclerator? Here are some criteria
> that I'd like to use in evaluating APC vs. eacclerator: 1) compatibility, 2)
> stability and 3) speed.
>
> Some older posts on the net (from 2006) complained about incompatibilities
> between APC/eacclerator and phpBB and about crashes of APC/eacclerator. I'm
> hoping that these problems have been cleared up by now.
Many years ago now I was using PHPAccelerator... when it stopped being
updated I made the switch. At that time I checked out both APC and
eaccelerator and found eaccelerator to be the faster for my needs.
Recently, and I don't recall the link, I read something that indicated
eaccelerator is faster than APC. Mileage may vary though depending on
individual usage patterns. Either way, I'd say they are probably fairly
interchangeable.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP