Re: Mailing List fun
| From: | tedd | Date: | Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:52:04 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Mailing List fun | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-281343@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 4:36 PM -0400 10/1/08, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:33 PM, tedd <tedd.sperling@gmail.com> wrote:Here's a link that explains what people used to think. http://www.permadi.com/tutorial/websafecolor/ But that's not the way it actually is. There has been a more exhaustive study of those colors and it was discovered that very few of those colors were "web-safe" (i.e., no differences in color) across different browsers. Cheers, tedd -- ------- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.comThe term "web-safe" when applied to images was a misnomer -- there was no such thing. It originally pertained to certain colors that were consider staples of browsers, such as red, white, blue, cornflowerblue, and so. I think there was 256 of them -- but I may be wrong.What's wrong with everyone? No one has yet thrown out a Wikipedialink. I know damn well that some of you looked it up!