Re: Mailing List fun
| From: | Ashley Sheridan | Date: | Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:10:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Mailing List fun | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-281350@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 16:52 -0400, Jason Pruim wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:33 PM, tedd <tedd.sperling@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> The term "web-safe" when applied to images was a misnomer -- there
> >> was no
> >> such thing.
> >>
> >> It originally pertained to certain colors that were consider
> >> staples of
> >> browsers, such as red, white, blue, cornflowerblue, and so. I think
> >> there
> >> was 256 of them -- but I may be wrong.
> >
> > What's wrong with everyone? No one has yet thrown out a Wikipedia
> > link. I know damn well that some of you looked it up!
>
> We are waiting for you to get off your lazy ass and do some work for
> us! :P
>
>
When I said web-safe images, I didn't mean images that were in web-safe
colours. You all know that browsers can only be relied upon to display
jpeg, gif and png images. Well, jpeg has 2 formats, one that browsers
can display (web-safe) and one that browsers can't (jpeg 2000 not
web-safe).
I hope this clears things up?
Ash
www.ashleysheridan.co.uk