Re: Re: maybe we could all?

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Nathan Rixham <nrixham@gmail.com> wrote: > Daniel Brown wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:28, Daniel Brown <danbrown@php.net> wrote: >> >>> Maybe you could call it PEAR. ;-P >>> >> >> (Sent too quickly. Meant to include this, too:) >> >> A good place to start is by showing how this would benefit from >> things like PEAR and PECL. >> > > care to contrib that info / thoughts dan? :-) good idea. > > or counter: maybe completely out with pear/pecl/php scope; just some devs > sharing some work then open sourcing it for anybody who wants. wouldn't want > people assuming it was linked to php official/endorsed (like you just noted > with phpclasses) > > Also note that phpclasses.org isn't an >> official or endorsed PHP project, it's a completely third-party site >> and project operated by non-PHP-Group folks (in case you meant to >> insinuate that it was a part of the PHP project). >> > > lol noted, tis just master lemos ad filled site of other peoples work ya? > (he does have some good classes of his own, no down talking meant lol) > > > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > I think this is a good idea. It's almost like building and sharing a data type validation system with developers from all over the world. -- Kyle Terry | www.kyleterry.com