Re: maybe we could all?
| From: | Nathan Rixham | Date: | Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:43:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: maybe we could all? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-286786@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edmund Hertle wrote:
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham <nrixham@gmail.com>sounds like a starting point. and the starting point imho, interfaces and abstracts, then implementations. [can't wait for a discussion on the implementation of "Email" lmfao] can i gather that this is a postive response and a few interested parties? if so important things like is this discussed on this list or where, need for server space and svn? etc scope for a user group / list @ php on this? or what..? + all monkeys no organ grinder approach, no release until all happy (negating obvious trouble makers) and maybe a release manager for svn. more thoughts pleasesounds good; (discussion begins) - but if we're all going to use them in production maybe we'd need to use say php 5.1.6 or the most common accross all os's and servers..? how many servers will have php 5.3 support from the off (think redhat servers!)Well, what about not discussing about concrete implementation, but more like: By creating a user class you have to consider: this & than & ..., and methods which should be implemented should do... and maybe creating an abstract class or an interface or concrete class but not exactly defined to the end (because that WOULD be possibly more something like pear) Maybe more an aspect of "Design Pattern"...?