Re: maybe we could all?
| From: | Paul M Foster | Date: | Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:20:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: maybe we could all? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-286820@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:57:25PM +0000, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
>
> method: for everybody who wishes to contribute, and for everybody to
> review, discuss and work on the same classes.
>
> what are they: classes we can all use, that have been discussed,
> reviewed and agreed between many great developers around the world.
>
> the classes: all the common ones we can re-use from "User" to "Address"
> "Email" "Article" and beyond, also perhaps wrappers for primatives /
> scalars.
>
> expanding: extra abstract classes we can also use, common interfaces for
> the above; eventually maybe utility classes as well.
>
> the idea wouldn't be a framework or another php classes, more of a repo
> full of common classes to save us all some time, and as a nice project
> anybody can contribute to and which we can all discuss and debate the
> finer grained details.
>
> additional: these would maybe be best to stick to common usage, so if we
> have say a "User" class in our own project with specific needs, we can
> simply extend the base user class and add our own functionality.
>
> thinking of putting this distraction and debate time to good use that we
> can all benefit from.
>
> would also propose sticking to php 5.X [we could decide a version] and
> obviously OO; but then if the procedural guys wanted they could as well.
>
> maybe it's just me, no commitment, no solid work, just bits of contrib
> and discussion / feedback.
>
> follow? thoughts? comments? interest?
>
> [everybody, even tony, would need max input and discussion to get the
> best solutions for us all, and class at a time should mean we get a
> steady stream of classes to the repo.. think about 6 months down the line]
>
You really don't have enough to do, do you?
Paul
--
Paul M. Foster