Re: maybe we could all?
| From: | Nathan Rixham | Date: | Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:35:26 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: maybe we could all? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-286795@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Nathan Rixham <nrixham@gmail.com> wrote:open to debate; my preference for now goes to sourceforge as it's all there including space with php support; proven you know. However i like new projects as well so open but overall +1 goes to whatever gets us up and running with the least time spent. and on the other side.. to open things up interface Object { } or abstract class Object { } or class Object { } nothing else for now: reason: to address the current and forseable lack of function(object $obj) in php; in addition to allow future scope for any common to all methods (or any implementation of this to have) i guess first is it a good idea to have any of the above and to address this, then next if so which?Eric Butera wrote:http://gitorious.org/On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kyle Terry <kyle@kyleterry.com> wrote:lol and sourceforge [doh]; that way if anything takes off natural user base and integrated promotion "most active" - possibly with aid of tony :DOn Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Edmund Hertle < edmund.hertle@student.kit.edu> wrote:Guys there's plenty of free "open source" hosted svn/git servers. Do a google search.2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham <nrixham@gmail.com>Well, I use Comcast and they put a 250gig cap per month of their residential customer, so my server can only be used temporarily if we need one.sounds like a starting point. and the starting point imho, interfaces and abstracts, then implementations. can i gather that this is a postive response and a few interested parties? if so important things like is this discussed on this list or where, need for server space and svn? etc scope for a user group / list @ php on this? or what..? + all monkeys no organ grinder approach, no release until all happy (negating obvious trouble makers) and maybe a release manager for svn. more thoughts pleaseWell, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up SVN, webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the end this is only used by 4-5 people.